I love having these debates with Ai. They always end with it agreeing with me and sounding exasperated in so doing 😂. We have a way to go to get the truth out there but "the truth will put".
There seems to me to be a basic incompatibility between the main tenets of the pre-1707 Scottish and English Constitutions, namely that the former contains the Claim of Right (1689) whilst the latter has the Bill of Rights (also 1689) at its heart.
That is, it is people (Scotland) that are sovereign whilst it is the (Crown in) Parliament that is sovereign in England. Never the twain shall meet!
I reckon that is why there is a so-called ‘unwritten constitution’ relating to the British State: It’s a fudge. It couldn’t be codified without breaking the fundaments upon which the Treaty of Union is based. A reconciliation would have the effect of breaching either the English Bill of Rights or the Scottish Claim of Right.
Neither the BoR nor the CoR were revoked And it is clear that the actual written constitutions of both nations are still extant.
I live on one of those islands, and have done for many years. Yes the CD's contribute to the UK Defence fund with sums of between £1m and £3m per annum. The standing joke of course amongst the Channel Islanders at least, is that the only time the Islanders needed any 'defence' was in 1940 when the islands were invaded and occupied by the German forces for the next 5 years. .....any response from the UK government.....? , not a peep.
The Islands are the most staunchest of monarchists, and a very heavy bias towards any Right Wing Party.
Please Scots...do not elect to become a Crown Dependency when Independent, become completely unshackled to the UK.
Hung on to the end with brain reeling at this early point in the day. Seems that anything contradicting or criticising anything in our so called 'union'..can be ignored or twisted cleverly to suit the foreign english cesspit...and no -one has the will or nohow to deal with it. Who will stand up and say ..'this is wrong'. Certainly not charles mountbatten windsor saxe coburg smith ( or whatever appendage he goes by at the moment) .. he is well protected by the hidden 'foreign english backroom boys' keeping Scotland in line...and worst of all OUR so called representatives (who appear to be suffering from independence dementia,....eh ? whit? independence? whit's that?.).....couldn't care less..and as for the Scottish people ..the ones that are sovereign...but don't seem to know it...perfect mushrooms.
The answer to this problem is.. . Direct action ..UDI. Ignore all the paragraph 8 section 4 junk.
It's all the 'kings new clothes' ploy or ' trust in me'....as Kaa the snake in Jungle book sang......with poor old mesmerised Scotland nodding blankly in agreement...
But there's a wee lad at the back of the crowd shouting..'yer only a wee agricultural family from Germany who changed their name 'cause we were fighting the Germans and yer now hiding behind the name of a castle..windsor!
All this crap set up to prove an ordinary german family are really royal - descended from god ..is just a pack of LIES...like everything else in this battle to keep Scotland subjugated while feeding the foreign english appetite for power or oil or water or windpower or whatever they can get their parasitic paws on....Diana called them lizards and lizards have the ability to change their colours and blend in with their surroundings...
Ignore ChatGPT or any other malicious entity.... let the skin fall off your eyes and see what is actually going on...like that wee Scottish guy at the back of the crowd. He's still shouting...'the gemme's a bogey charles mountbatten windsor saxe coburg smith robinson.. yer definitely not our king. '
I think you need to read it again. There is a lot of material in there that is useful to the independence campaign. In general, the conclusions cast considerable doubt on the validity of the Union and the monarchy. I haven't thought it through properly yet - AI doesn't do housework - but there are at least a couple of points that will strengthen the arguments for #ScottishUDI.
Now, I just need time to write up my thoughts on the matter. AI doesn't do laundry either.
Not put out of course, that would be overly generous.....just out! 😜
I love having these debates with Ai. They always end with it agreeing with me and sounding exasperated in so doing 😂. We have a way to go to get the truth out there but "the truth will put".
Out
There seems to me to be a basic incompatibility between the main tenets of the pre-1707 Scottish and English Constitutions, namely that the former contains the Claim of Right (1689) whilst the latter has the Bill of Rights (also 1689) at its heart.
That is, it is people (Scotland) that are sovereign whilst it is the (Crown in) Parliament that is sovereign in England. Never the twain shall meet!
Research and assessment work carried out by Sara Salyers of Salvo shows that this contradiction was never resolved in 1707 or going from that time (https://yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com/2022/03/14/scotlands-claim-of-right-part-2/).
I reckon that is why there is a so-called ‘unwritten constitution’ relating to the British State: It’s a fudge. It couldn’t be codified without breaking the fundaments upon which the Treaty of Union is based. A reconciliation would have the effect of breaching either the English Bill of Rights or the Scottish Claim of Right.
Neither the BoR nor the CoR were revoked And it is clear that the actual written constitutions of both nations are still extant.
Interesting article ref Crown Dependencies.
I live on one of those islands, and have done for many years. Yes the CD's contribute to the UK Defence fund with sums of between £1m and £3m per annum. The standing joke of course amongst the Channel Islanders at least, is that the only time the Islanders needed any 'defence' was in 1940 when the islands were invaded and occupied by the German forces for the next 5 years. .....any response from the UK government.....? , not a peep.
The Islands are the most staunchest of monarchists, and a very heavy bias towards any Right Wing Party.
Please Scots...do not elect to become a Crown Dependency when Independent, become completely unshackled to the UK.
Hung on to the end with brain reeling at this early point in the day. Seems that anything contradicting or criticising anything in our so called 'union'..can be ignored or twisted cleverly to suit the foreign english cesspit...and no -one has the will or nohow to deal with it. Who will stand up and say ..'this is wrong'. Certainly not charles mountbatten windsor saxe coburg smith ( or whatever appendage he goes by at the moment) .. he is well protected by the hidden 'foreign english backroom boys' keeping Scotland in line...and worst of all OUR so called representatives (who appear to be suffering from independence dementia,....eh ? whit? independence? whit's that?.).....couldn't care less..and as for the Scottish people ..the ones that are sovereign...but don't seem to know it...perfect mushrooms.
The answer to this problem is.. . Direct action ..UDI. Ignore all the paragraph 8 section 4 junk.
It's all the 'kings new clothes' ploy or ' trust in me'....as Kaa the snake in Jungle book sang......with poor old mesmerised Scotland nodding blankly in agreement...
But there's a wee lad at the back of the crowd shouting..'yer only a wee agricultural family from Germany who changed their name 'cause we were fighting the Germans and yer now hiding behind the name of a castle..windsor!
All this crap set up to prove an ordinary german family are really royal - descended from god ..is just a pack of LIES...like everything else in this battle to keep Scotland subjugated while feeding the foreign english appetite for power or oil or water or windpower or whatever they can get their parasitic paws on....Diana called them lizards and lizards have the ability to change their colours and blend in with their surroundings...
Ignore ChatGPT or any other malicious entity.... let the skin fall off your eyes and see what is actually going on...like that wee Scottish guy at the back of the crowd. He's still shouting...'the gemme's a bogey charles mountbatten windsor saxe coburg smith robinson.. yer definitely not our king. '
For OUR Scotland and her weans.
I think you need to read it again. There is a lot of material in there that is useful to the independence campaign. In general, the conclusions cast considerable doubt on the validity of the Union and the monarchy. I haven't thought it through properly yet - AI doesn't do housework - but there are at least a couple of points that will strengthen the arguments for #ScottishUDI.
Now, I just need time to write up my thoughts on the matter. AI doesn't do laundry either.