Discussion about this post

User's avatar
yesindyref2's avatar

OT - National article yesterday: "Keir Starmer blew hole in claims of ‘independent UK nuclear deterrent’"

and another one today with another CND person saying:

"with Starmer this week admitting during a press conference that Trident relied on Washington"

as though it's new news.He did no such thing - he just restated a position that has been totally open knowledge for decades, including me posting details btl in the Herald during Indy Ref. The UK gets its Trident missiles from a pool of 55 from Kings Bay in the Us, and at any one time with NPT there are just 8 out of 16 tubes on Vanguard loaded - with a 55 ton missile married to a warhead using the mobile dock at Faslane, and another boat taking over every 3 or 6 months for a total of 16 missiles out of 55; simple maths say that this gives a maximum of 6 month or so with some being serviced in the US.

Laughable crap like that doesn't help; there is indeed a debate to be had now because of Trump - is it worth spending billions on a deterrent the US can cancel (illegally) without notice effectively with just 6 month use then afterwards? Even those who believe in the nuclear deterrent may well say "no".

The CND should know better, in fact, they actually do - they're usually quite well informed not surprisingly - this information is all in the public domain.

Headline grabbing sensationalism is no substitute for truthful and open debate.

yesindyref2's avatar

One date missing:

Deadline for registering new party or amending details with the EC: 5pm on Friday 30th January

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?